Germany is on a different footing from most of Vietnam's other European partners, in one specific and easily missed way.
Vietnam joins the Hague Apostille Convention on 11 September 2026, which for most countries replaces a multi step consular chain with a single certificate. Germany, along with Austria and the Czech Republic, objected to Vietnam's accession.
That objection means German documents keep the old route. It is the kind of detail that does not appear in a general guide and that changes a document budget and a timetable.
The document rule that applies to Germany and almost nowhere else
| Most countries, from 11 Sep 2026 | Germany, Austria, Czech Republic | |
|---|---|---|
| Route | Single apostille from the issuing state's competent authority | Full consular legalisation chain |
| Steps | One | Notarisation, foreign ministry, Vietnamese mission |
| Cost | Lower | Unchanged |
| Time | Shorter | Unchanged |
- An objection by a contracting state prevents the Convention taking effect between that state and the acceding state.
- So a German corporate document still needs the consular chain, while a French or Italian one will not.
- Budget and schedule accordingly, because the difference is real in both money and weeks.
- Check before paying for anything, since objections can be withdrawn and the position may change.
This is the single most useful thing on this page for anyone about to legalise documents.
What Vietnam asks of you
- Full foreign ownership is available in most sectors, subject to the negative list.
- A legal representative must reside in Vietnam.
- Online filing requires a Vietnamese electronic identity, which needs a residence card for a foreign national.
- Since 31 March 2026 you may incorporate first and obtain the investment certificate within twelve months.
The process is in how to register a company in Vietnam.
Two agreements, one in force
| EVFTA | EVIPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Covers | Trade in goods and services | Investment protection and dispute settlement |
| In force | Yes, 1 August 2020 | No |
| Outstanding | Nothing | Ratification by all 27 member state parliaments, at 18 as at 2025 |
German commentary sometimes describes investor protections as available. The trade agreement is in force and delivers the tariff outcome; the protection agreement is not, and a German investor should not build a risk assessment on it.
The German test that decides how the subsidiary is taxed
- 1German rules treat a regime as low taxed below 15 percentApplied to the rate on the income in question rather than to a headline national rate
- 2Vietnam's ordinary corporate rate is 20 percentAbove the line, so an ordinary subsidiary is not low taxed on this measure
- 3Vietnam's incentive rate for qualifying projects is 10 percentBelow the line, and now available for the whole operating period in prioritised cases
- 4Control, income character and substance are tested separatelyThe rate is one element of the analysis, not the whole of it
- The German definition of a low tax regime is one where the rate applicable to the income in question is less than 15%.
- Vietnam's standard 20% is above that, so an ordinary Vietnamese subsidiary is not low taxed on the rate measure.
- Vietnam's 10% incentive rate is below it, and Law No. 67/2025/QH15 now allows that rate for the entire operating period in specially prioritised industries and areas.
- The rate is not the whole test. German rules also examine control, the character of the income and the substance of the operation, and those require German advice.
The counterintuitive conclusion is worth stating: for a German group, winning a Vietnamese tax incentive can move the subsidiary into the analysis it would otherwise have avoided.
The Vietnamese incentives are described in corporate income tax in Vietnam.
What German businesses build in Vietnam
| Model | Fit |
|---|---|
| Manufacturing and engineering | The core case, and Vietnam's industrial base supports it |
| Sourcing and quality assurance | Common, and light on capital |
| Machinery and equipment distribution | Real, given what Vietnam imports |
| Holding structure only | Poor fit, as Vietnam administers as an operating jurisdiction |
For manufacturers, the change that matters most is that industrial park location stopped producing a tax incentive on 1 October 2025. A site selection made on that basis needs revisiting.
Getting profit back to Germany
- Dividends to a corporate shareholder carry no Vietnamese withholding on the majority view, and 5% to an individual.
- The compulsory Vietnamese audit comes first, regardless of the company's size.
- Seven working days notice to the Vietnamese tax authority precedes any remittance.
- Funds move through the investment capital account.
- German treatment of the receipt depends on the participation exemption and on the controlled foreign company position.
The resident representative, for a German group
- A secondment is the usual answer for a manufacturing entry, and it tends to create Vietnamese tax residence for the person sent, since a long lease can establish habitual residence on its own.
- A local appointment costs less and needs precise charter drafting, because a legal representative whose powers are not divided can bind the company toward third parties.
- The role controls the filing systems, since the company's electronic identity account depends on the representative holding a verified personal account.
- Work permit analysis comes before arrival, not after, and knowledge transfer to Vietnamese staff is a stated obligation for foreign experts.
Sequencing a German entry
- Confirm the document route. Consular legalisation, not apostille, and it is slower than the alternative your Italian or French counterparts will use.
- Take German tax advice on the incentive question before the investment certificate application fixes the project's incentive status.
- Decide the representative, because the identity chain and the bank both depend on that person.
- Incorporate, which starts the ninety day charter capital clock.
- Fund through the investment capital account, which since 18 August 2026 can be opened before the investment certificate.
The German specific step is the first one, and it is the one most likely to be planned on the wrong assumption between now and the point where general guidance catches up with the objection.
Where it goes wrong
- Preparing documents for an apostille, which will be refused, because Germany objected to the accession.
- Assuming EVIPA protections apply, when the agreement is not in force.
- Pursuing a Vietnamese incentive without checking the German consequence of an effective rate below 15%.
- Building a factory case on industrial park incentives that ended on 1 October 2025.
- Sending equipment as a capital contribution without allowing for the extra time the law grants for transport and import, which changes the ninety day deadline but has to be documented.
- Assuming a German bank will handle the outbound transfer routinely, when the Vietnamese receiving account and its purpose still have to be explained.
The bottom line
Two German specific facts should shape this project before anything else is decided.
Documents follow the consular route rather than the apostille one, because of an objection that most guides will not mention for months. And a Vietnamese tax incentive, which looks like a straightforward win, moves the subsidiary across the German low tax line rather than away from it.
Neither is a reason to avoid Vietnam. Both are reasons to take German advice before the Vietnamese application rather than after the certificate is issued, because the certificate records the project's incentive status and the documents have already been paid for by then.
Frequently asked questions
Can German documents use an apostille for Vietnam?
No. Germany objected to Vietnam's accession to the Hague Apostille Convention, along with Austria and the Czech Republic, so consular legalisation remains the route for documents moving between Vietnam and those three countries.
When does the apostille start applying for other countries?
The Convention enters into force for Vietnam on 11 September 2026, replacing consular legalisation with a single apostille for public documents from states that did not object.
Does Vietnam count as a low tax country for German CFC rules?
Not at the ordinary rate. German rules treat a regime as low taxed where the rate on the income is below 15%, and Vietnam's standard corporate rate is 20%. The position can differ for a project on the 10% incentive rate.
Is the EU Vietnam investment protection agreement in force?
No. EVIPA requires ratification by all 27 member state parliaments and stood at 18 as at 2025 reporting. The EVFTA, which covers trade, has been in force since 1 August 2020.
Do industrial parks in Vietnam still carry a tax incentive?
No. Law No. 67/2025/QH15 eliminated industrial zone incentives from 1 October 2025 and the implementing decree removed industrial parks from the list of qualifying areas.
Can a German company own 100 percent of a Vietnamese company?
In most sectors yes. Vietnam's restrictions are by activity rather than nationality, with a short list of closed sectors and a longer list of conditional ones.
How does profit reach Germany?
Through the investment capital account, after the audited financial statements and annual tax finalisation are filed, with at least seven working days notice to the Vietnamese tax authority. The audit is therefore on the critical path to any distribution.
Sources
- Erickson Immigration Group and Acclime reporting that Vietnam's accession to the Hague Apostille Convention takes effect on 11 September 2026, and that Germany, Austria and the Czech Republic objected
- Winheller on German controlled foreign corporation rules under the Aussensteuergesetz, including the definition of a low tax regime as a rate below 15 percent
- VCCI WTO Center on the EVFTA in force from 1 August 2020 and on EVIPA still requiring ratification by all member states
- Alvarez and Marsal on Vietnamese corporate income tax incentives under Law No. 67/2025/QH15, including the 10 percent rate for qualifying projects
The apostille position is reported by immigration and corporate advisers from the Hague Conference notifications; objections by a contracting state prevent the Convention entering into force between that state and the acceding state, and the practical effect described here follows from that. The German low tax threshold of 15 percent is taken from published commentary on the Aussensteuergesetz; the application of German controlled foreign corporation rules turns on control, income character and substance tests that are not reproduced here and require German tax advice. Agreement dates and EVIPA ratification status are those published by the VCCI WTO Center, with the 18 of 27 figure reflecting 2025 reporting. The Vietnamese side reflects Law No. 143/2025/QH15, Decree No. 96/2026/ND-CP and Law No. 67/2025/QH15. This is not legal or tax advice.
